InterNIC Annual Progress Report and Program Year 4 Plan
Network Solutions, Inc.
505 Huntmar Park Drive
Herndon,
Virginia 20170
[Table of Contents omitted.]
8/30/96
1. Significant Events
Significant InterNIC Registration Services events for the period from December
1, 1994 through March 31, 1996 include the following:
- Knowledgenet, Inc. filed a law-suit in which Network Solutions was named
regarding the assignment of the domain name knowledgenet.com; the suit was
eventually dropped and the original domain name holder agreed to relinquish
the name to Knowledgenet, Inc.
- Prestone, Inc. filed a law-suit in which Network Solutions was named as a
co-defendant regarding the domain name PRESTONE.COM. The domain name holder
relinquished the name and Prestone dismissed, with prejudice, the suit against
Network Solutions.
- A new ticketing system was designed and installed to help customers and
internal staff better track current registration requests.
- Two new duplicate on-line systems were installed to help off-load the
amount of processing on the primary server.
- Informal meetings were held involving InterNIC staff and representatives
from RIPE, IANA, APNIC and various Internet Service Providers to discuss
issues regarding network allocation policies.
- A draft version of InterNIC policy and procedure guidelines for network
number allocations were prepared and approval was obtained from Jon Postel;
additional work ultimately resulted in the release of RFC 1466bis.
- A new Internet Service Provider template was designed and made available
on-line.
- The Scout HQ project (including Net Happenings) moved to the University of
Wisconsin through a subcontract between Susan Calcari and Network Solutions; a
new web site was established as part of the InterNIC Registration Services web
site.
- A Domain Dispute Policy was established and put into effect on July 28,
1995; a revised version went into effect on November 23, 1995.
- As of September 14, 1995, InterNIC Registration Services started charging
for second level domain names in these top-level domain name categories: COM,
NET, ORG, GOV, and EDU.
- As of February 1996, credit card payments for domain name registrations
are being accepted over the telephone.
Additional information regarding significant events can be found in the status
column of Table 2-1, Status of 1995 Objectives.
2. Accomplishments
2.1 Accomplishments With Regard to 1995 Objectives
Table 2-1 summarizes accomplishments made with regard to 1995 InterNIC
Registration Services goals and objectives set by Network Solutions in the
Annual Progress Report delivered in 1995 for the period starting on December
1, 1993 and ending on November 30, 1994.
Table 2-1 Status of 1995 Objectives
Objective
|
Status
|
Implement domain name fee policy
|
- Policy was implemented September 14, 1995.
- Systems and processes to support invoicing of new domain names and
collection of fees are in place and operational.
- System enhancements to support invoicing of domain name renewals are still
being developed.
- Payments arc accepted by check, money order, or credit card; electronic
payment options are still being investigated.
|
Include funds for the following within the InterNIC Registration Services
budget: Root server maintenance, legal fees for domain name disputes, and IANA
consulting support
|
- The 1996 budget contains estimated costs for each of these items.
- Root server maintenance cost support has been offered to each of the
organizations owning the servers; two have expressed interest and terms are
being negotiated.
- Legal support and IANA consulting support are being funded from user fees.
|
Implement a ticketing system that allows for more efficient processing of
domain name applications as well as interactive registration via the World
Wide Web
|
- The ticketing system is in place and operating.
- Domain name registration and update templates are available and in use on
the web.
- Interactive domain name registration on the web is an objective that is
still being worked.
|
Deliver high quality service in a timely fashion for distribution and
registration of Autonomous System and IP numbers and for registration of
domain names by augmenting staff, making equipment improvements and
re-engineering processes
|
- The InterNIC is still striving to achieve the objective of high quality
service; excessive growth rates continue to impact service quality.
- Staff size was increased significantly in 1995 and additional increases
will be required in 1996 as demand for InterNIC services continues to
escalate.
- Equipment/software upgrades and additions were made in 1995 and plans are
underway to upgrade and add new equipment/software in 1996.
- Processes have been analyzed in detail and are continually being improved
to better meet customer needs.
- Backlog of AS and IP numbers has been minimized consistently.
- Backlog of name registrations and updates has been a persistent problem;
an intense effort to eliminate this backlog is underway and the objective of
eliminating it should be achieved by mid to late March 1996.
|
Assist in establishing new delegated registries
|
- Support for the AP-NIC was provided by allowing an AP-NIC staff member to
work at the InterNIC for several months.
- Sufficient demand for anticipated registries in South America and Africa
has not materialized to date.
|
Continue efforts to deploy and improve an operational RWhois application
|
- Work to standardize and formalize the RWhois protocol has continued
through the IETF working group process.
- Internet community discussion has continued with regard to operational
issues about how delegated registries should use Rwhois.
- Rwhois is in operation in all 50 states for the US domain as well as in
approximately 40 companies in other domains.
- RWhois application development work has been accomplished through the
combined efforts of Mark Kosters and Scott Williamson, with Scott providing
support under a consulting agreement; this work will continue throughout 1996.
|
Continue to work with Internet Service Providers that have been issued CIDR
blocks to implement inverse addressing on the entire block instead of
individual records
|
- The InterNIC Registration Services IP Section under the leadership of Kim
Hubbard worked intensively with ISPs regarding this issue.
- An IN-ADDR template was designed and implemented in the summer of 1995.
- All ISPs receiving /16 bits or less (>= 256 class Cs) from the InterNIC
are now responsible for maintaining all IN-ADDR.ARPA domain records for their
respective customers, including maintenance of IN-ADDR.ARPA domain records of
all longer prefixes that have been delegated out of a block.
|
Attend and participate in meetings sponsored by IETF, International Congress
of Internet Service Providers and NANOG
|
(Refer to Section 3 below for information regarding the fulfillment of this
objective.)
|
2.2 Performance Accomplishments
This section contains the following tables and charts that summarize InterNIC
Registration Service performance statistics for the period beginning December
1, 1994 and ending February 29, 1996:
Figure 2-1
|
Cumulative Growth by Domain (COM, EDU, ORG, NET)
|
Table 2-2
|
Cumulative Domain Name Registrations by Month
|
Figure 2-2
|
Top Level Domain Distribution as of 2/29/96
|
Figure 2-3
|
New Domain Names Registered by Month
|
Figure 2-4
|
Domain Updates Per Month
|
Figure 2-5
|
IP Numbers Allocated Per Month
|
Figure 2-6
|
Telephone & Postal/Fax Requests
|
Figure 2-7
|
Whois Queries by Month
|
Figure 2-8
|
E-Mail Received Monthly at the Hostmaster Address
|
Table 2-3
|
InterNIC Connections/Retrievals Per Month
|
Table 2-4
|
InterNIC Workload Increases from December 1994 to March 1996
|
Table 2-5
|
Average Processing Days Per Request
|
Table 2-6
|
US Domain Monthly Activity.
|
[Figure 2-1 omitted.]
[Table 2-2 omitted.]
[Figure 2-2 omitted.]
[Figure 2-3 omitted.]
[Figure 2-4 omitted.]
[Figure 2-5 omitted.]
[Figure 2-6 omitted.]
[Figure 2-7 omitted.]
[Figure 2-8 omitted.]
[Table 2-3 omitted.]
[Table 2-4 omitted.]
[Table 2-5 omitted.]
[Table 2-6 omitted.]
The InterNIC registered the following 28 new country Top Level Domains (TLDs)
since December 1, 1994, bringing the total to 160. A listing of these TLDs is
provided in Table 2-7 below:
[Table 2-7 omitted.]
3. Community Involvement
Since December 1, 1994, the InterNIC has pursued an aggressive outreach
program in the Internet community. The goal of this effort has been to solicit
ideas regarding which services are of value and in what direction the InterNIC
should move with regard to new support programs and information services. On
September 5, 1995 a "NIC Liaison" staff position was filled by Tom Newell from
the University of Texas at Austin. The NIC Liaison has augmented the outreach
program through its focus on the R&E community.
3.1 Community Outreach Activities
Table 3-1 identifies major community outreach activities undertaken from
December 1, 1994 through March 31, 1996.
Table 3-1 Community Outreach Activities
Month
|
Activity
|
December 1994
|
- 31st IETF meeting, San Jose, California
- Scott Williamson and Mark Kosters participated in this meeting.
|
January 1995
|
- RIPE Meeting, Amsterdam
- Kim Hubbard made a presentation detailing InterNIC IP assignments and
allocation guidelines while Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview and
discussed RFC 1466bis development.
|
February 1995
|
- North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) meeting, Denver, Colorado
- Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview and discussed RFC 1466bis
implications regarding IP number allocations.
|
April 1995
|
- 32nd Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) meeting, Danvers,
Massachusetts
- A number of InterNIC staff participated in the IETF meeting, making
registration-related presentations, discussing policy and developmental
issues, and providing feedback to participants.
- Mark Kosters hosted the RWhois working group.
|
May 1995
|
- NANOG meeting, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview and discussed RFC 1466bis
implications for IP allocations.
|
June 1995
|
- INET 95 Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii
- Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview.
|
July 1995
|
- 33rd IETF meeting, Stockholm, Sweden
- Mark Kosters chaired the RWhois working group meeting.
- Kim Hubbard attended registration-related meetings and presented RFC
1466bis and IP allocation plans.
|
September 1995
|
- NANOG meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Several staff members participated in this meeting, providing overviews of
InterNIC activity, updates related to IP allocation guidelines, and answering
questions related to domain name dispute issues.
|
October 1995
|
- ACM, Special Interest Group for University and College Computing Services,
St. Louis, Missouri
- Tom Newell made a presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and
Beyond."
- Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding useful InterNIC
information programs and services.
- Some of the key themes which emerged included a focus on modular training
materials and an emphasis on supporting smaller R&E organizations.
- Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) meeting, Portland, Oregon
- Tom Newell delivered the presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and
Beyond."
- Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding developing
useful InterNIC information programs and services.
- Key themes included an urging for the InterNIC to participate in community
activities which relate to Internet information services and technologies.
- Tom agreed to participate with the CNI white paper project exploring
federal electronic information issues and how they impact R&E libraries.
- EDUCOM Conference, Portland, Oregon
- Tom Newell made the presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and
Beyond."
- Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding developing
useful Internet information programs and services.
- The theme of supporting smaller institutions continued but with a focus on
the library community as the natural avenue for addressing InterNIC support of
those organizations which support Internet end-users.
|
November 1995
|
- CAUSE 95 Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana
- Tom Newell made the presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and
Beyond," to members of the R& E community.
- Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding developing
useful Inter information programs and services.
- It was clear that the InterNIC is not well-recognized within management
and director-level functions within the R& E community.
- Texas Higher Education Network (THEnet) meeting, Austin, Texas
- Tom Newell made a presentation regarding the InterNIC and the directions
it has taken.
- Tom also met with THEnet representatives to discuss InterNIC support of
the R&E community.
|
December 1995
|
- 34th IETF meeting, Dallas, Texas
- Several InterNIC staff members attended the December IETF meeting,
participating in registration and user-services related meetings and
discussions.
- Mark Kosters chaired the RWhois working group meeting.
- Kim Hubbard participated in discussions related to IP allocation policies.
- Jasdip Singh participated in DNS and "Mobile-IP" meetings.
- Tom Newell made the presentation to the User Services Working Group
entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and Beyond."
- The InterNIC agreed to provide assistance to the User Service Working
Group (USWG) in promoting IETF user services information and revisions to the
USWG WWW site.
- NSF/DNCRI & Harvard Information Infrastructure Project, Washington,
D.C.
- Kim Hubbard and David Graves participated in this workshop, exploring
issues related to Internet administrative infrastructure topics.
|
January 1996
|
- American Library Association/Library and Information Technology
Association (LITA) meeting, San Antonio, Texas
- Tom Newell met with the Board of Directors for LITA and proposed a
partnership in developing a WWW-base Internet training resource for the R
& E community.
|
February 1996
|
- CIX/ISOC Workshop, Washington, D.C
- Several InterNIC staff members participated in this NSF-sponsored workshop
to discuss support issues for the administrative infrastructure of the
Internet.
- Mark Kosters participated as a member of the panel examining the technical
implications of registration policy.
|
March 1996
|
- 35th IETF meeting, Los Angeles, California
- Mark Kosters, Jasdip Singh, Tom Newell, Kim Hubbard and Julie Robichaux
participated in this meeting.
- Digital Libraries meeting, Washington, D.C.
- Tom Newell plans to participate in this meeting.
- Coalition for Networked Information meeting, Washington, D.C.
- Tom Newell plans to participate in this meeting.
|
An important lesson learned from the outreach activities listed above is that
the InterNIC project is primarily visible as a result of the registry function
and not for any information or support services it may offer.
3.2 InterNIC Site Visits
In addition to the Internet community outreach activities listed in Table 3-1
above, the InterNIC hosted many visitors at the Registration Services site in
Herndon, Virginia.
Organizations hosted at the InterNIC site included but were not limited
to:
- APNIC
- RIPE
- Sprint
- PSI.
- IBM Japan.
Individuals hosted by the InterNIC included but were not limited to:
- Jon Postel
- Paul Mockapetris
- Peter Lothberg
- Ann Cooper (.US domain)
- Jerry Sharf (CIX).*
* The meeting with Jerry Sharf at the InterNIC was an important effort at
defining "Common Object Schema" for inter-registry coordination.
3.3 Feedback from the Research and Education (R & E) Community
In support of the R&E outreach effort and to complement conference/meeting
presentations included in Table 3-1 above, Tom Newell pursued a dialogue with
representatives of the higher education community to seek ideas for future
InterNIC support. This.group included among others:
- Jim Williams (FARNET)
- Martyne Hallgren (Cornell)
- Gleason Sackman (SENDIT)
- Karen Coyle (UC Berkeley)
- Don Nash (UT Austin)
- Jodi Ito (University of Hawaii)
- Jerry Martin (Ohio State University)
- Paul Peters (Coalition for Networked Information)
- Larry Landweber (University of Wisconsin)
- Linda Hutchinson (Iowa State University)
- Joyce Reynolds (USC-ISI)
- Chuck McClure (Syracuse University)
- Joan Cheverie (Georgetown University/CNI)
- Sue Feldman (Digital Access Coalition, Cornell University)
- Jim Conklin (CREN)
- Susan Hales (Bucknell University)
- Joanna Colgrove (Reed College).
Discussions with R & E community representatives resulted in the following
conclusions:
- The R & E community places a great deal of value on training-support
materials which can be used with little modification. In this regard, the
InterNIC is:
- Working with the American Library Association to create a training support
service for Internet trainers comprised of extensible and modular packages.
- Coordinating with Patrick Crispin to host on-going E-Mail-based training
seminars.
- The R & E community is interested in technology developments chat
impact its use of the Internet:
- The InterNIC is viewed as a logical clearinghouse for Internet-related
information.
- Useful InterNIC services would provide growth and demographic data for the
Internet which includes registration information, routing statistics and
measurements, development patterns, and international growth data.
- Despite its origins in the R & E community, the InterNIC has come to
be viewed as an organization which serves the larger, international community;
support and information services should be designed with this fact in mind.
- Responsive, accurate, and timely services are fundamental to registry
operations.
4. Net Scout Project
4.1 Significant Events and Accomplishments
The following summarizes the significant events and accomplishments of the Net
Scout Project during the third year of InterNIC Registration Services:
- The Net Scout Project was re-established under the Computer Sciences
Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, campus in May 1995.
- The Scout report resumed a regular, weekly publication schedule during the
summer of 1995.
- Susan Calcari was instrumental in the selection of 'NIC Liaison" position,
and in the start-up of InterNIC's outreach efforts to the R&E community.
- A new Net Scout service called The Scout Toolkit was announced at Educom
in October 1995.
5. 1995 Financial Information
COST ELEMENT
|
APPROVED BUDGET
|
YEAR 3 (through 9/13/95)
|
EXPLANATION
|
TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL
|
3.7 F.T.E.
|
2.3 F.T.E.
|
- Mark Kosters worked more hours than planned.
- Bob McCollum worked fewer hours than planned
- Academic Liaison position filled S months after planned.
- Project Manager position not filled
|
OTHER PROFESSIONALS
|
25.5 F.T.E.
|
17.9 F.T.E.
|
- Staffing less than planned due to difficulty in finding qualified
technical personnel.
|
SECRETARIAL CLERICAL
|
1 F.T.E.
|
.5 F.T.E.
|
- Staffing less than planned due to recruiting and hiring problems.
|
DIRECT LABOR DOLLARS
|
$543,229
|
$335,187
|
FRINGE BENEFITS
| | |
- Directly proportionate to decrease in direct labor dollars.
|
TRAVEL: DOMESTIC
|
$41,644
|
$11,053
|
- Fewer trips than planned; staff not available for travel due to personnel
shortages.
|
TRAVEL: FOREIGN
|
$21,143
|
$11,211
|
- Fewer trips than planned; staff not available for travel due to personnel
shortages.
|
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
|
$15,800
|
$61,979
|
- FAX Modems not purchased.
- Supplies used less than planned
- Unplanned purchases from Computerware and Sun Microsystems.
|
SUBCONTRACTS
|
$286,336
|
$181,754
|
- Scott Williamson billed less than projected
- Susan Calceri's execution significantly underran budget.
- Domain Consulting Services not used
|
OTHER
|
$68,111
|
$107,645
|
- Long distance telephone costs less than forecasted
- No production/printing costs due to delay in implementing Outreach
Programs.
- Membership fees not incurred.
- Change in accounting system resulted in unplanned Computer Service Center
costs allocated to project.
|
INDIRECT COSTS
| | |
- Directly proportionate to changes to total direct labor, total travel, and
total other direct costs. Overhead decreased due to lower direct labor costs;
Material Burden decreased due to lower indirect rate and lower materials
costs; Other indirect costs remained unchanged. Fixed fee unchanged from that
which was approved for Year 3. Net effect is decrease in indirect costs.
|
TOTAL COSTS
|
$1,953,648
|
$1,244,413
|
6. 1996 Goals and Objectives
6.1 InterNIC Registration Services Goals and Objectives
In planning for 1996 InterNIC services, the Network Solutions team set some
general goals and then developed short and long-term performance objectives
designed to help achieve those goals.
6.1.1 InterNIC Mission
Network Solutions' mission with regard to InterNIC Registration Services is
to:
- Improve the quality of services to all customers supported, including
internal and external customers, large provider organizations, and individual
end-users, and be recognized by those customers as an organization that:
- Responds to all customers in a responsible and competent manner
- Offers service that is reasonable, consistent and equitable to all
customers in the context of the overall Internet community
- Is trustworthy, honest and accountable to all customers and to the
Internet community at large.
- Gain increased respect of the overall Internet community with regard to:
- Timely responsiveness to customer requests
- Security and accuracy of InterNIC transactions
- Internet knowledge and technical leadership
- Stewardship responsibilities associated with the overall community
- Strengthen international customer support services
- Initiate outreach services to developing regions of the world.
6.1.2 InterNIC Registration Services
Network Solutions' highest priority in the first three to six months of 1996
is to improve the quality of services currently being provided. A summary of
currently offered registration services is presented in Table 5-1.
Table 6-1 InterNIC Registration Services
InterNIC Section
|
Services Offered
|
Domain Registration
|
- Register names, hosts and people
- Update domain name records
- Answer customer questions
- Provide domain name dispute information
|
IP
|
- Register IP numbers, ASNs, SWIPs and IN-ADDRs
- Update network records
- Answer network questions
- Provide network configuration support
|
Liaison
|
- Provide Internet outreach support to the R&E community
- Provide Internet outreach support to the academic community
- Represent the InterNIC at R&E and academic conferences
- Provide InterNIC support programs for the overall community
- Provide Internet Information Services
- Provide list management support associated with the above
services
- Provide InterNIC Web management support for the above services
- Represent the InterNIC as a spokesperson in the overall
community
- Mediate between the Internet community and InterNIC operations
- Assist in the development of and ongoing quality control of all
InterNIC documentation and policy development
|
Receivables
|
- Send 60-day notices for domain name renewals
- Generate and send invoices for new and renewal domain names
- Process customer payments including application of payments to
customer accounts, processing credit card payments, preparing deposits, and
transferring data to SAIC corporate record-keeping systems
- Answer customer billing questions
|
Engineering
|
- Develop, maintain and improve automated processing systems to
support services provided by other InterNIC Sections
- Specify requirements for, monitor performance of, and
administer all hardware and software in support of automated services
- Ensure the highest levels of security for all InterNIC
operations
- Provide technical guidance for InterNIC policy development
efforts
- Provide technical representation of the InterNIC at Internet
technical forums
- Develop, maintain and improve automated processing tools and
performance measurement systems
- Update root name servers
- Administer InterNIC databases
- Provide technical list management support
- Provide Internet research and development support
- Plan for next generation InterNIC technology
- Support the ongoing development and implementation of RWhois
|
Business Management
|
- Manage the domain name dispute process
- Ensure compliance with applicable laws and policies
- Provide legal direction regarding InterNIC policy development
- Serve as contractual liaison with the National Science
Foundation
- Oversee media relations
|
Facilities Management
|
- Provide work space, equipment and software for all InterNIC
staff
- Provide communications equipment and software for help desk
telephone support
- Procure equipment and software in support of all InterNIC
services
|
6.1.3 Short-Term Performance Objectives
Specific short-term (3-6 months) performance objectives for 1996 are as
follows:
Operations Objectives
- Upon receipt of all required information, provide one-day response time
for the following electronically received requests:
- Domain registration support requests
- Billing support requests
- General information inquiries
- Initiate a formal internal training program to ensure improved preparation
of operations staff members to be able to provide top quality, consistent, and
reliable customer support
- Train and use temporary hires to assist in the elimination of Domain
Registration and Receivables Section backlog and to provide help desk
telephone support
- Modify work schedules to maximize the use of available facilities and
equipment and to better respond to customer support needs
- Develop and implement a customer service representative accountability
system
Engineering Section Objectives
- Provide 7x24 systems administration support
- Finish development of and implement Guardian
Help Desk Objectives
- Provide telephone help desk support that satisfies the following criteria:
- Call abandon rate of less than 8%
- Average customer wait time of less than two minutes
- Average time to return voice mail requests of less than two hours.
- Implement a revised voice mail script to improve the distribution of help
desk telephone calls
- Expand help desk telephone support to cover from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Eastern
Time
- Procure and install:
- A voice mail performance measurement system
- An automatic fax back system
IP Section Objectives
- Upon receipt of all required information, provide three-day initial
response time for IP/network support requests
Liaison Section Objectives
- Implement the "15 Minute Series" training program in partnership with the
American Library Association.
- Implement, promote and manage the technical support requirements for
hosting the Patrick Crispin ROADMAP email-based training program; integrate
this service and the Atlas service with planned InterNIC Information and
User-oriented programs.
- As part of an "FYI: InterNIC," document and incorporate a user-focused
Frequently Asked Questions service; edit and expand for possible Internet
Draft status as part of the IETF process.
- Promote an electronic "InterNIC News" newsletter focusing on events and
developments of interest to the R&E and Internet community,
- Host focus-group to discuss R&E outreach "lessons-learned."
Scout Services
- Fully integrate Net-happenings into Net Scout Services, including salary,
Web pages, and close coordination with InterNIC activities.
- Hire additional staff to provide full self-sufficiency for Net Scout
Services: programmer, system administrator, writer/editor, special librarian.
- Survey research and education community users of all Scout Services to
determine who and how many use the services and how the services can better
fit their needs.
- Conduct extensive community outreach to assure all researchers and
educators are aware of our offerings.
Receivables Section Objectives
- Provide customers the following within one calendar week of the date
shown:
- 60-day domain name renewal notices (60 days prior to anniversary
date)Invoices for domain name renewals (30 days prior to anniversary date)
- 1 5-day reminder notices for domain name renewals (15 days prior to
anniversary date)
- Invoices for new domain names (name registration date)
Management Objectives
- Increase InterNIC staff levels in all sections as applicable to be able to
reach and maintain the above service levels
- Implement a concentrated recruiting/hiring program to fill personnel
requisitions as well as any requisitions opened in the near future
- Initiate quality assurance performance measures to assist in the
identification of training, process improvement and personnel improvement
needs
- Develop and implement a plan to improve forecasting of personnel space and
equipment needs
- Evaluate the current InterNIC organizational structure to determine if
efficiencies and service improvements could be gained by organizing in
different ways (e.g., redefining the Hostmaster function, separating telephone
support from template processing, etc.)
- Write and distribute a description of InterNIC services
- Write and distribute a paper discussing multiple registry issues
- Eliminate all single points of failure with regard to personnel and
systems
- Develop and implement the following InterNIC Registration Services
policies:
- Authorization for Domain Name Record Modifications
- Domain Name Transfer
- Domain Name Removal
- IP Allocation Guidelines
- Lame Delegation
- Multiple Domain Names
- Offensive Domain Names
- Policy Development.
6.1.4 Long-Term Performance Objectives
Network Solutions has set the following performance objectives to be achieved
in the 6 to 24 month time frame:
Engineering Section Objectives
- Develop and implement an on-line registration process on the Web
- Develop an InterNIC disaster recovery plan
- Plan for the possible redesign of the InterNIC database
- Develop plans for a normalized/classless database
IP Section Objectives
- Participate in and plan for the possibility of an IP number charging
scheme
- Plan for the transition to Ipv6
Liaison Section Objectives
- Tailor curriculums within the "15 Minute Series" program for a broader
segment of the community.
- Investigate Discipline-based Network Information Centers (DNICs). Identify
a prototypical discipline for investigation purposes. Staff as necessary to
provide research, technical, and management oversight of the effort.
- Investigate Mbone-based training initiatives focused on facilitating the
use of interactive technologies in the R&E classroom. Work with the IETF
User Services Working Group to define this collaborative effort
- Work with InterNIC management teams to implement a "Knowledge-Base"
product for Help Desk operations.
- Extend R&E outreach efforts to a wider community as part of a public
relations and on-going quality assurance program.
Scout Services
- Establish a new service, the Scout Sprouts Report, a bi-weekly newsletter
of Internet resources written by kids, for kids. Two introductory issues will
be published in April 1996 and regular publication will begin in the fall.
- Develop an online, browsable subject catalog of all online resources and
tools announced by Net Scout Services, including the archives of the Scout
Report and Net-happenings for the past two years.
- Coordinate with Registration Services, the library community, and other
organizations providing information about online resources to determine the
best way to organize and deliver information about Internet resources in the
long term.
- Make Net Scout Services the place researchers and educators go to fad the
best Internet resources and tools. Success will be measured by the comments
received from the community, the awards received, and the amount of usage the
services receive.
Receivables Section Objectives
- Implement a more user-friendly and easier to process invoice
- Research and implement an on-line payment process
Management Objectives
- Develop and implement an improved customer feedback mechanism
- Research and implement systems and processes to monitor registration
transaction quality including electronic and telephone support services
- Develop and implement a plan to reduce areas of vulnerability with regard
to root server operation
- Establish an InterNIC backup site
- Determine the value of creating a Program Control/Business Forecasting
position
- Evaluate the value of hiring a Customer Service Manager who would be
responsible for quality control of all customer service interfaces
- Use a systemic approach to perform a comprehensive process analysis to
identify areas for improvement
- Establish service-level agreements with our customers
7. 1996-98 Budget Information
|
Total
|
Revenue
|
|
Registration Services - New
|
$ 7,455
|
|
Registration Services - Maintenance
|
12,327
|
|
Holdback Revenue
|
6,000
|
|
Registrations Services - Renewals
|
2,285
|
|
Total Revenue
|
32,955
|
Direct labor
|
3,462
|
Fringe
|
Holdback expenses
|
6,000
|
Overhead
|
ODC's
|
3,009
|
Bad Debt Expense
|
8,087
|
M&S Overhead
|
|
Sub Total
|
G&A
|
M&S
|
|
Total Cost
|
Operating Profit
|
Operating Profit as a Percent of Revenue
|
Revenue
- Registrations will grow from 28,000 / period to 60,000 / period by the end
of the fiscal year.
- NSI will collect 70% of the registrations (both news and renewals). The
remaining 30% will be uncollectable.
- The 30% holdback (amount to be reinvested in the Internet Infrastructure)
is recognized as revenue when spent. The projection assumes $6M will have been
spent by 3/31/97.
Expenses
- Program staffing will increase by approximately 100% to 150 people.
- Subcontracts continue with University of Wisconsin and ISI at a projected
annual rate of $850K.
- Legal costs continue to ramp up and are projected to be $1M, exclusive of
NSI and SAIC staff.
- Significant investments in hardware and software continue to be made in
order to support our expanding customer base.