InterNIC Annual Progress Report and Program Year 4 Plan

Network Solutions, Inc.
505 Huntmar Park Drive
Herndon, Virginia 20170

[Table of Contents omitted.]

8/30/96

1. Significant Events

Significant InterNIC Registration Services events for the period from December 1, 1994 through March 31, 1996 include the following:

Additional information regarding significant events can be found in the status column of Table 2-1, Status of 1995 Objectives.

2. Accomplishments

2.1 Accomplishments With Regard to 1995 Objectives

Table 2-1 summarizes accomplishments made with regard to 1995 InterNIC Registration Services goals and objectives set by Network Solutions in the Annual Progress Report delivered in 1995 for the period starting on December 1, 1993 and ending on November 30, 1994.

Table 2-1 Status of 1995 Objectives

Objective

Status

Implement domain name fee policy

  • Policy was implemented September 14, 1995.
  • Systems and processes to support invoicing of new domain names and collection of fees are in place and operational.
  • System enhancements to support invoicing of domain name renewals are still being developed.
  • Payments arc accepted by check, money order, or credit card; electronic payment options are still being investigated.

Include funds for the following within the InterNIC Registration Services budget: Root server maintenance, legal fees for domain name disputes, and IANA consulting support

  • The 1996 budget contains estimated costs for each of these items.
  • Root server maintenance cost support has been offered to each of the organizations owning the servers; two have expressed interest and terms are being negotiated.
  • Legal support and IANA consulting support are being funded from user fees.

Implement a ticketing system that allows for more efficient processing of domain name applications as well as interactive registration via the World Wide Web

  • The ticketing system is in place and operating.
  • Domain name registration and update templates are available and in use on the web.
  • Interactive domain name registration on the web is an objective that is still being worked.

Deliver high quality service in a timely fashion for distribution and registration of Autonomous System and IP numbers and for registration of domain names by augmenting staff, making equipment improvements and re-engineering processes

  • The InterNIC is still striving to achieve the objective of high quality service; excessive growth rates continue to impact service quality.
  • Staff size was increased significantly in 1995 and additional increases will be required in 1996 as demand for InterNIC services continues to escalate.
  • Equipment/software upgrades and additions were made in 1995 and plans are underway to upgrade and add new equipment/software in 1996.
  • Processes have been analyzed in detail and are continually being improved to better meet customer needs.
  • Backlog of AS and IP numbers has been minimized consistently.
  • Backlog of name registrations and updates has been a persistent problem; an intense effort to eliminate this backlog is underway and the objective of eliminating it should be achieved by mid to late March 1996.

Assist in establishing new delegated registries

  • Support for the AP-NIC was provided by allowing an AP-NIC staff member to work at the InterNIC for several months.
  • Sufficient demand for anticipated registries in South America and Africa has not materialized to date.

Continue efforts to deploy and improve an operational RWhois application

  • Work to standardize and formalize the RWhois protocol has continued through the IETF working group process.
  • Internet community discussion has continued with regard to operational issues about how delegated registries should use Rwhois.
  • Rwhois is in operation in all 50 states for the US domain as well as in approximately 40 companies in other domains.
  • RWhois application development work has been accomplished through the combined efforts of Mark Kosters and Scott Williamson, with Scott providing support under a consulting agreement; this work will continue throughout 1996.

Continue to work with Internet Service Providers that have been issued CIDR blocks to implement inverse addressing on the entire block instead of individual records

  • The InterNIC Registration Services IP Section under the leadership of Kim Hubbard worked intensively with ISPs regarding this issue.
  • An IN-ADDR template was designed and implemented in the summer of 1995.
  • All ISPs receiving /16 bits or less (>= 256 class Cs) from the InterNIC are now responsible for maintaining all IN-ADDR.ARPA domain records for their respective customers, including maintenance of IN-ADDR.ARPA domain records of all longer prefixes that have been delegated out of a block.

Attend and participate in meetings sponsored by IETF, International Congress of Internet Service Providers and NANOG

(Refer to Section 3 below for information regarding the fulfillment of this objective.)

2.2 Performance Accomplishments

This section contains the following tables and charts that summarize InterNIC Registration Service performance statistics for the period beginning December 1, 1994 and ending February 29, 1996:

Figure 2-1

Cumulative Growth by Domain (COM, EDU, ORG, NET)

Table 2-2

Cumulative Domain Name Registrations by Month

Figure 2-2

Top Level Domain Distribution as of 2/29/96

Figure 2-3

New Domain Names Registered by Month

Figure 2-4

Domain Updates Per Month

Figure 2-5

IP Numbers Allocated Per Month

Figure 2-6

Telephone & Postal/Fax Requests

Figure 2-7

Whois Queries by Month

Figure 2-8

E-Mail Received Monthly at the Hostmaster Address

Table 2-3

InterNIC Connections/Retrievals Per Month

Table 2-4

InterNIC Workload Increases from December 1994 to March 1996

Table 2-5

Average Processing Days Per Request

Table 2-6

US Domain Monthly Activity.

[Figure 2-1 omitted.]

[Table 2-2 omitted.]

[Figure 2-2 omitted.]

[Figure 2-3 omitted.]

[Figure 2-4 omitted.]

[Figure 2-5 omitted.]

[Figure 2-6 omitted.]

[Figure 2-7 omitted.]

[Figure 2-8 omitted.]

[Table 2-3 omitted.]

[Table 2-4 omitted.]

[Table 2-5 omitted.]

[Table 2-6 omitted.]

The InterNIC registered the following 28 new country Top Level Domains (TLDs) since December 1, 1994, bringing the total to 160. A listing of these TLDs is provided in Table 2-7 below:

[Table 2-7 omitted.]

3. Community Involvement

Since December 1, 1994, the InterNIC has pursued an aggressive outreach program in the Internet community. The goal of this effort has been to solicit ideas regarding which services are of value and in what direction the InterNIC should move with regard to new support programs and information services. On September 5, 1995 a "NIC Liaison" staff position was filled by Tom Newell from the University of Texas at Austin. The NIC Liaison has augmented the outreach program through its focus on the R&E community.

3.1 Community Outreach Activities

Table 3-1 identifies major community outreach activities undertaken from December 1, 1994 through March 31, 1996.

Table 3-1 Community Outreach Activities

Month

Activity

December 1994

  • 31st IETF meeting, San Jose, California
    • Scott Williamson and Mark Kosters participated in this meeting.

January 1995

  • RIPE Meeting, Amsterdam
    • Kim Hubbard made a presentation detailing InterNIC IP assignments and allocation guidelines while Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview and discussed RFC 1466bis development.

February 1995

  • North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) meeting, Denver, Colorado
    • Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview and discussed RFC 1466bis implications regarding IP number allocations.

April 1995

  • 32nd Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) meeting, Danvers, Massachusetts
    • A number of InterNIC staff participated in the IETF meeting, making registration-related presentations, discussing policy and developmental issues, and providing feedback to participants.
    • Mark Kosters hosted the RWhois working group.

May 1995

  • NANOG meeting, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview and discussed RFC 1466bis implications for IP allocations.

June 1995

  • INET 95 Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii
    • Mark Kosters provided an InterNIC overview.

July 1995

  • 33rd IETF meeting, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Mark Kosters chaired the RWhois working group meeting.
    • Kim Hubbard attended registration-related meetings and presented RFC 1466bis and IP allocation plans.

September 1995

  • NANOG meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Several staff members participated in this meeting, providing overviews of InterNIC activity, updates related to IP allocation guidelines, and answering questions related to domain name dispute issues.

October 1995

  • ACM, Special Interest Group for University and College Computing Services, St. Louis, Missouri
    • Tom Newell made a presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and Beyond."
    • Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding useful InterNIC information programs and services.
    • Some of the key themes which emerged included a focus on modular training materials and an emphasis on supporting smaller R&E organizations.
  • Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) meeting, Portland, Oregon
    • Tom Newell delivered the presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and Beyond."
    • Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding developing useful InterNIC information programs and services.
    • Key themes included an urging for the InterNIC to participate in community activities which relate to Internet information services and technologies.
    • Tom agreed to participate with the CNI white paper project exploring federal electronic information issues and how they impact R&E libraries.
  • EDUCOM Conference, Portland, Oregon
    • Tom Newell made the presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and Beyond."
    • Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding developing useful Internet information programs and services.
    • The theme of supporting smaller institutions continued but with a focus on the library community as the natural avenue for addressing InterNIC support of those organizations which support Internet end-users.

November 1995

  • CAUSE 95 Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana
    • Tom Newell made the presentation entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and Beyond," to members of the R& E community.
    • Tom sought the input of conference participants regarding developing useful Inter information programs and services.
    • It was clear that the InterNIC is not well-recognized within management and director-level functions within the R& E community.
  • Texas Higher Education Network (THEnet) meeting, Austin, Texas
    • Tom Newell made a presentation regarding the InterNIC and the directions it has taken.
    • Tom also met with THEnet representatives to discuss InterNIC support of the R&E community.

December 1995

  • 34th IETF meeting, Dallas, Texas
    • Several InterNIC staff members attended the December IETF meeting, participating in registration and user-services related meetings and discussions.
    • Mark Kosters chaired the RWhois working group meeting.
    • Kim Hubbard participated in discussions related to IP allocation policies.
    • Jasdip Singh participated in DNS and "Mobile-IP" meetings.
    • Tom Newell made the presentation to the User Services Working Group entitled, "The InterNIC: Year 3 and Beyond."
    • The InterNIC agreed to provide assistance to the User Service Working Group (USWG) in promoting IETF user services information and revisions to the USWG WWW site.
  • NSF/DNCRI & Harvard Information Infrastructure Project, Washington, D.C.
    • Kim Hubbard and David Graves participated in this workshop, exploring issues related to Internet administrative infrastructure topics.

January 1996

  • American Library Association/Library and Information Technology Association (LITA) meeting, San Antonio, Texas
    • Tom Newell met with the Board of Directors for LITA and proposed a partnership in developing a WWW-base Internet training resource for the R & E community.

February 1996

  • CIX/ISOC Workshop, Washington, D.C
    • Several InterNIC staff members participated in this NSF-sponsored workshop to discuss support issues for the administrative infrastructure of the Internet.
    • Mark Kosters participated as a member of the panel examining the technical implications of registration policy.

March 1996

  • 35th IETF meeting, Los Angeles, California
    • Mark Kosters, Jasdip Singh, Tom Newell, Kim Hubbard and Julie Robichaux participated in this meeting.
  • Digital Libraries meeting, Washington, D.C.
    • Tom Newell plans to participate in this meeting.
  • Coalition for Networked Information meeting, Washington, D.C.
    • Tom Newell plans to participate in this meeting.

An important lesson learned from the outreach activities listed above is that the InterNIC project is primarily visible as a result of the registry function and not for any information or support services it may offer.

3.2 InterNIC Site Visits

In addition to the Internet community outreach activities listed in Table 3-1 above, the InterNIC hosted many visitors at the Registration Services site in Herndon, Virginia.

Organizations hosted at the InterNIC site included but were not limited to:

Individuals hosted by the InterNIC included but were not limited to:

* The meeting with Jerry Sharf at the InterNIC was an important effort at defining "Common Object Schema" for inter-registry coordination.

3.3 Feedback from the Research and Education (R & E) Community

In support of the R&E outreach effort and to complement conference/meeting presentations included in Table 3-1 above, Tom Newell pursued a dialogue with representatives of the higher education community to seek ideas for future InterNIC support. This.group included among others:

Discussions with R & E community representatives resulted in the following conclusions:

4. Net Scout Project

4.1 Significant Events and Accomplishments

The following summarizes the significant events and accomplishments of the Net Scout Project during the third year of InterNIC Registration Services:

5. 1995 Financial Information

COST ELEMENT

APPROVED BUDGET

YEAR 3 (through 9/13/95)

EXPLANATION

TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL

3.7 F.T.E.

2.3 F.T.E.

  • Mark Kosters worked more hours than planned.
  • Bob McCollum worked fewer hours than planned
  • Academic Liaison position filled S months after planned.
  • Project Manager position not filled

OTHER PROFESSIONALS

25.5 F.T.E.

17.9 F.T.E.

  • Staffing less than planned due to difficulty in finding qualified technical personnel.

SECRETARIAL CLERICAL

1 F.T.E.

.5 F.T.E.

  • Staffing less than planned due to recruiting and hiring problems.

DIRECT LABOR DOLLARS

$543,229

$335,187

FRINGE BENEFITS

  • Directly proportionate to decrease in direct labor dollars.

TRAVEL: DOMESTIC

$41,644

$11,053

  • Fewer trips than planned; staff not available for travel due to personnel shortages.

TRAVEL: FOREIGN

$21,143

$11,211

  • Fewer trips than planned; staff not available for travel due to personnel shortages.

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES

$15,800

$61,979

  • FAX Modems not purchased.
  • Supplies used less than planned
  • Unplanned purchases from Computerware and Sun Microsystems.

SUBCONTRACTS

$286,336

$181,754

  • Scott Williamson billed less than projected
  • Susan Calceri's execution significantly underran budget.
  • Domain Consulting Services not used

OTHER

$68,111

$107,645

  • Long distance telephone costs less than forecasted
  • No production/printing costs due to delay in implementing Outreach Programs.
  • Membership fees not incurred.
  • Change in accounting system resulted in unplanned Computer Service Center costs allocated to project.

INDIRECT COSTS

  • Directly proportionate to changes to total direct labor, total travel, and total other direct costs. Overhead decreased due to lower direct labor costs; Material Burden decreased due to lower indirect rate and lower materials costs; Other indirect costs remained unchanged. Fixed fee unchanged from that which was approved for Year 3. Net effect is decrease in indirect costs.

TOTAL COSTS

$1,953,648

$1,244,413

6. 1996 Goals and Objectives

6.1 InterNIC Registration Services Goals and Objectives

In planning for 1996 InterNIC services, the Network Solutions team set some general goals and then developed short and long-term performance objectives designed to help achieve those goals.

6.1.1 InterNIC Mission

Network Solutions' mission with regard to InterNIC Registration Services is to:

6.1.2 InterNIC Registration Services

Network Solutions' highest priority in the first three to six months of 1996 is to improve the quality of services currently being provided. A summary of currently offered registration services is presented in Table 5-1.

Table 6-1 InterNIC Registration Services

InterNIC Section

Services Offered

Domain Registration

  1. Register names, hosts and people
  2. Update domain name records
  3. Answer customer questions
  4. Provide domain name dispute information

IP

  1. Register IP numbers, ASNs, SWIPs and IN-ADDRs
  2. Update network records
  3. Answer network questions
  4. Provide network configuration support

Liaison

  1. Provide Internet outreach support to the R&E community
  2. Provide Internet outreach support to the academic community
  3. Represent the InterNIC at R&E and academic conferences
  4. Provide InterNIC support programs for the overall community
  5. Provide Internet Information Services
  6. Provide list management support associated with the above services
  7. Provide InterNIC Web management support for the above services
  8. Represent the InterNIC as a spokesperson in the overall community
  9. Mediate between the Internet community and InterNIC operations
  10. Assist in the development of and ongoing quality control of all InterNIC documentation and policy development

Receivables

  1. Send 60-day notices for domain name renewals
  2. Generate and send invoices for new and renewal domain names
  3. Process customer payments including application of payments to customer accounts, processing credit card payments, preparing deposits, and transferring data to SAIC corporate record-keeping systems
  4. Answer customer billing questions

Engineering

  1. Develop, maintain and improve automated processing systems to support services provided by other InterNIC Sections
  2. Specify requirements for, monitor performance of, and administer all hardware and software in support of automated services
  3. Ensure the highest levels of security for all InterNIC operations
  4. Provide technical guidance for InterNIC policy development efforts
  5. Provide technical representation of the InterNIC at Internet technical forums
  6. Develop, maintain and improve automated processing tools and performance measurement systems
  7. Update root name servers
  8. Administer InterNIC databases
  9. Provide technical list management support
  10. Provide Internet research and development support
  11. Plan for next generation InterNIC technology
  12. Support the ongoing development and implementation of RWhois

Business Management

  1. Manage the domain name dispute process
  2. Ensure compliance with applicable laws and policies
  3. Provide legal direction regarding InterNIC policy development
  4. Serve as contractual liaison with the National Science Foundation
  5. Oversee media relations

Facilities Management

  1. Provide work space, equipment and software for all InterNIC staff
  2. Provide communications equipment and software for help desk telephone support
  3. Procure equipment and software in support of all InterNIC services

6.1.3 Short-Term Performance Objectives

Specific short-term (3-6 months) performance objectives for 1996 are as follows:

Operations Objectives

Engineering Section Objectives

Help Desk Objectives

IP Section Objectives

Liaison Section Objectives

Scout Services

Receivables Section Objectives

Management Objectives

6.1.4 Long-Term Performance Objectives

Network Solutions has set the following performance objectives to be achieved in the 6 to 24 month time frame:

Engineering Section Objectives

IP Section Objectives

Liaison Section Objectives

Scout Services

Receivables Section Objectives

Management Objectives

7. 1996-98 Budget Information

Total

Revenue

Registration Services - New

$ 7,455

Registration Services - Maintenance

12,327

Holdback Revenue

6,000

Registrations Services - Renewals

2,285

Total Revenue

32,955

Direct labor

3,462

Fringe

Holdback expenses

6,000

Overhead

ODC's

3,009

Bad Debt Expense

8,087

M&S Overhead

Sub Total

G&A

M&S

Total Cost

Operating Profit

Operating Profit as a Percent of Revenue

Revenue

Expenses